Nursing Outlook
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 31-36, January 2003

The proving grounds: Combat nursing in Vietnam

Jeanne J. LeVasseur is an associate professor in the Department of Nursing, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut.

Abstract 

Purpose: The profession of nursing has been greatly influenced by war, and the heroic nature of the work of nursing is often emphasized during war. The purpose of this research was to examine the stories of nurses' experiences during combat in Vietnam and identify themes that would corroborate, refute, or expand prior historical research. Organizing construct and methods: A content analysis to determine recurrent themes was performed on 18 oral histories of military nurses who served in Vietnam that were previously collected and published. Analysis of these collections of oral histories was conducted, and thick quotes contextualize and substantiate the thematic claims. Findings and conclusions: This research confirms the analysis of prior historical research on nursing in Vietnam by finding similar experiences recorded in oral histories and further claims that an authentic professional identity is often forged during the hardships and heroic opportunities of war.

Nurs Outlook 2003;51:31-36.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprint requests: Jeanne J. LeVasseur, PhD, RN, 275 Mt. Carmel Road, Hamden, CT 06518.

PII: S0029-6554(02)05453-2

doi:10.1067/mno.2003.1

Nursing Outlook
Volume 51, Issue 1 , Pages 31-36, January 2003