An evaluation framework for faculty practice

References 

1. Pohl JM, Duderstadt K, Tolve-Schoeneberger C, Uphold CR, Hartig MT National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. Faculty practice: What do the data show? Findings from the NONPF Faculty Practice Survey. Nurs Outlook. 2002;506:238–246
2. Saxe JM, Burgel BJ, Collins-Bride GM, Stringari-Murray S, Dennehy P, Holzemer W. Strategic planning for UCSF’s community health nursing faculty practices. Nurs Outlook. 2004;524:179–188
3. Sawyer MJ, Alexander IM, Gordon L, Juszczak LJ, Gilliss C. A critical review of current nursing faculty practice. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2000;1212:511–516
4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. AACN position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. Washington, DC 2004. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/DNPPositionStatement.htm. Accessed September 29, 2005.
5. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. National organization of nurse practitioner faculties NONPF guidelines for evaluation of faculty practice. In:  Marion L editors. Faculty practice: Applying the models. Washington, DC: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties; 1997;p. 9–10
6. Edwards JB, Oppewal S, Logan CL. Nurse-managed primary care: Outcomes of a faculty practice network. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2003;1512:563–569
7. McNiel NO, Mackey TA, Sherwood GD. Quality and customer service aspects of faculty practice. Nurs Outlook. 2004;524:189–196
8. Miller KL, Bleich MR, Hathaway D, Warren C. Developing the academic nursing practice in the midst of new realities in higher education. J Nurs Educ. 2004;432:55–59
9. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Position statement of defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Washington, DC. 1999. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/scholar.htm. Accessed September 29, 2005.
10. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties NONPF Faculty Practice Committee. Faculty Practice Promotion and Tenure (Faculty Practice and Promotion and Tenure). 2003;
11. Glassick CE. Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000;759:877–880
12. Brown MA. Academic faculty practice: Enrichment through synergism. Appl Nurs Res. 2001;141:56–61
13. Burgener SC. Scholarship of practice for a practice profession. J Prof Nurs. 2001;171:46–54
14. Dracup K. Impact of faculty practice on an academic institution’s mission and vision. Nurs Outlook. 2004;524:174–178
15. Paskiewicz LS. Clinical practice: An emphasis strategy for promotion and tenure. Nurs Forum. 2003;384:21–25
16. Sherwen LN. When the mission is teaching: Does nursing faculty practice fit?. J Prof Nurs. 1998;143:137–143
17. Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990;
18. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. W.K. Kellogg Foundation evaluation handbook. 1998;Battle Creek, MI