Correction
Article Outline
The following erratum is a correction to the article, “Fellow Selection Process” by Susan Gennaro and Juliann G. Sebastian (Nurs Outlook 2006;54:306-308). The correction appears in the section titled, “The initial review process”, p. 306.
The sentence that needs to be corrected currently reads as follows:
“After this orientation, the first step in the review process is that each member of the dyad or triad individually reviews and scores each application as: (1) meeting the criteria for admission; (2) not meeting the criteria for admission, or (3) somewhat equivocal, suggesting the application needs further discussion”.
This sentence should be corrected to read:
“After this orientation, the first step in the review process is that each member of the dyad or triad individually reviews and scores each application as: (1) meeting the criteria for admission; (2) somewhat equivocal, suggesting the application needs further discussion; or (3) not meeting the criteria for admission”.
PII: S0029-6554(07)00014-0
doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2007.01.006
© 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Refers to article:
- Fellow selection process
