Perceptions of tenured nursing faculty related to decision-making for community service

References 

1. Putnam RD. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 2000;
2. Macfarlane B. The disengaged academic: The retreat from citizenship. Higher Education Quarterly. 2005;59:296–312
3. Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990;
4. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. Facing change: Building the faculty of the future. 1999;Washington, D.C.
5. O’Meara K. In: Rewarding faculty professional service. Working paper. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). Princeton, NJ: U.S. Department of Education; 1997;p. 1–37
6. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Position Statement on Defining Scholarship for the Discipline of Nursing. 1999;http://aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/scholar.htm. Accessed on May 6, 2006
7. Burrage J, Shattell M, Habermann B. The scholarship of engagement in nursing. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53:220–223
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (82 KB)
   • CrossRef
8. Dracup K. Impact of faculty practice on an academic institution’s mission and vision. Nurs Outlook. 2004;52:174–178
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (69 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Saxe JM, Burgel BJ, Stringari-Murray S, Collins-Bride GM, Dennehy P, Janson S, et al. What is faculty practice?. Nurs Outlook. 2004;52:166–173
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (108 KB)
   • CrossRef
10. Bravaro JA. In: A review of the construct of scholarship in the literature (Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)). U.S. Department of Education; 1997;p. 1–38
11. Colbeck CL. Integration: Evaluating faculty work as a whole. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002;43–52
12. Magner DK. Standards used to evaluate research should also be used for teaching and service. Chron High Educ. 1997;44:A18–A19
13. Huber WR, Hockaday J. In: Connecting the dots of the academic triangle: Combining teaching, research, and service in meaningful ways (Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)). U.S. Department of Education; 2002;p. 1–48
14. Colbeck CL, Michael PW. Public scholarship: Resynthesizing Boyer’s four domains. In:  Braxton JM editors. Delving further into Boyer’s research on scholarship (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 129, 7-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006;
15. Calleson DC, Jordon C, Seifer SD. Community-engaged scholarship: Is faculty working communities a true academic enterprise?. Acad Med. 2005;80:317–321
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Single S, Burack D, Hirsch D. In: The status of faculty professional service and academic outreach in New England. Working paper. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC). U.S. Department of Education; 1997;p. 1–28
17. Fairweather J. The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. J Higher Educ. 2002;73:26–48
18. Furman A. Measure professors’ real service, not lip service. Chron High Educ. 2004;51:B20
19. Blackburn RT, Lawrence JH. Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1995;
20. Colbeck CL, Michael PW. Individual and organizational influences on faculty members’ engagement in public scholarship. In:  Eberly RA,  Cohen J editor. Laboratory for public scholarship and democracy (New Directions for teaching and learning, No. 105, 17-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006;