Nursing Outlook
Volume 56, Issue 4 , Pages 167-173 , July 2008

Shared faculty governance: A decision-making framework for evaluating the DNP

  • Dorrie K. Fontaine, RN, PhD, FAAN

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dorrie K. Fontaine, RN, PhD, FAAN, University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing, 2 Koret Way Box 0604, San Francisco, CA 94143.
    • ,
  • Nancy A. Stotts, RN, EdD, FAAN, CNS
    • ,
  • JoAnne Saxe, RN, MS, ANP
    • ,
  • Meg Scott, RN, MS, FNP

References 

  1. Bargagliotti LA. The changing face of faculty and governance. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006;27:226
  2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing: DNP Road Map Task Force. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/DNProadmapreport.pdfAccessed on February 3, 2008
  3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice 2006. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/pdf/Essentials.pdfAccessed on February 3, 2008
  4. American Federation of Teachers. Shared Governance in Colleges and Universities: A Statement by the Higher Education and Program Council, 2000. http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/higher_ed/shared_governance.pdfAccessed on February 3, 2008
  5. American Association of University Professors. Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities 1990. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/policydocs/governancestatement.htmAccessed on February 3, 2008
  6. Scott JW. The critical state of shared governance. http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2002/02ja/02jasco.htmAccessed on February 3, 2008
  7. Tanner CA, Fitzpatrick JJ. What ever happened to faculty governance?. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:339–340
  8. Dracup K, Cronenwett L, Meleis AI, Benner PE. Reflections on the doctorate of nursing practice. Nurs Outlook. 2005;53:177–182
  9. Broome M. Collaboration: The devil's in the details. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55:1–2
  10. Eisenhauer L, Bleich MR. The clinical doctorate: Whoa or Go?. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:3–4
  11. Brown MA, Draye MA, Zimmer PA, et al. Developing a practice doctorate in nursing: University of Washington perspectives and experience. Nurs Outlook. 2006;54:130–138
  12. Chase SK, Pruitt RH. The Practice Doctorate: Innovation or Disruption?. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:155–161
  13. Fulton JS, Lyon BL. The need for some sense making: Doctor of Nursing Practice (Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 2007). http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume102005/Number3/tpc28_316027.aspxAccessed on February 3, 2008
  14. The case against the DNP: History, timing, substance and marginalization (Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 2007). http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume102005/Number3/tpc28_216026.aspxAccessed on February 3, 2008
  15. Hathaway D, Jacob S, Stegbauer C, Thompson C, Graff C. The Practice Doctorate: Perspectives of early adopters. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45:487–496
  16. Flood M. Promise on Parnassus: The First Century of UCSF School of Nursing. San Francisco CA: UCSF School of Nursing Press; 2007;
  17. Loomis J, Willard B, Cohen J. Difficult professional choices: Deciding between the DNP and the PhD in Nursing (Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 2006). http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume102005/Number3/tpc28_816033.aspxAccessed on February 3, 2008

PII: S0029-6554(08)00042-0

doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.02.008

Nursing Outlook
Volume 56, Issue 4 , Pages 167-173 , July 2008

Article Tools