Journal Home
Search for

Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 173-175 (May 2009)


View previous. 13 of 13

Translating nursing knowledge into practice: An uncommon partnership

Sally Lundeen, RN, PhD, FAANCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ellen Harper, RN, MBA, Karleen Kerfoot, PhD, RN, CNAA, FAAN

Article Outline

Addressing complex issues

Transcending organizational boundaries

Promoting a culture of innovation

Shared governance

References

Evidence-Based Nursing Practice (EBNP) has the potential to transform and improve the quality of health care and the safety of patients. This will only occur to the extent that nursing research is made accessible and actionable for use by nurses at the bedside. The estimate that research can take up to 17 years to be translated into practice1 speaks to the enormous gap between academic and practice settings. Health information science and technology has been heralded as a significant factor in the translation of research and best evidence into the practice arena. This introduces health information technology (HIT) vendors as yet a third organizational player into the mix. We believe that the radical changing of health care must be built on the effective integration of the cultures of organizations representing academe, healthcare delivery, and corporate HIT as the platform for change. Formalizing such multi-organizational collaborations is still rare in the healthcare industry. This is the backdrop against which the ACW Knowledge Based Nursing Initiative (KBNI) was undertaken nearly 4 years ago by a large integrated healthcare organization (Aurora Health Care), a global leader in HIT (Cerner Corporation) and a college of nursing (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee). The ACW KBNI serves as an exemplar of the opportunities and challenges inherent in the merging of 3 very different organizational cultures into a successful, albeit uncommon, partnership. We believe that the success of this uncommon partnership depends largely on our ability to move beyond the cultural norms of each partner's organization in the service of innovation and uncommon outcomes.

A classic definition proposed by Schein states that organizational culture is “A pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group learned as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way you perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems.”2

Each ACW KBNI partner is a very successful organization with well-established organizational culture and practices that have contributed to its success. Cultural patterns, once established in organizations, are not easily changed. As members of the Executive Group that is leading the ACW KBNI, we believe that the ongoing success of this exciting partnership will be based on our ability to:


Address complex issues

Transcend organizational boundaries

Promote a shared culture of innovation

Implement a shared governance structure

Addressing complex issues 

return to Article Outline

As organizations evolve over time, their natural tendency is to become increasingly complex. In acute care settings, no clinical role is more complex or interwoven across the interdisciplinary team than nursing. A collaborative approach to dealing with complex problems of bringing evidence to the point of care for nurses is essential and we are committed to approaching complex nursing workflow issues together rather than independently. The complexity of undertaking this project across organizational boundaries is astounding. The ACW KBNI lessons learned, to date, include the need to: (1) continually clarify communication and language amongst partners; (2) seek the simplest and most elegant solutions despite the complexity of the problems addressed; and (3) undertake operational analyses of the impact of KBNI on clinical practice and operations, while simultaneously establishing research protocols and a data repository that includes standardized nursing data suitable for rigorous longitudinal research and scientific discovery.

Transcending organizational boundaries 

return to Article Outline

All ACW partners recognize that identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing nursing knowledge to embed it into the workflow of the clinical information system (executable knowledge) requires the expertise of nurse researchers, practitioners, informaticians, and technology experts3, 4 Each of our organizations brings a unique and vital perspective to this collaboration as well as an existing culture related to problem-solving and solutions. ACW KBNI collaborators provide the strengths of the organizations they represent. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) team members identify and monitor the rigor of evidence, synthesize it to actionable recommendations, and take the lead on the research agenda. The nurses at Aurora, who are the consumers of the technology, bring real world perspectives on the complexity of patient quality and safety issues related to clinical practice at the bedside. They incorporate EBNP into professional practice and training materials. The informaticians from Cerner work with the other partners to appropriately code data elements to standard terminology and leverage the technology of the clinical information system to deliver EBNP at the point of care. A joint research team works to validate and extract data for analysis both for operations and outcomes research. Collectively, the partners are leveraging the technology of a clinical information system to fill the gaps between practice and knowledge.

Effective communication is essential to help group members build trust and respect, foster learning, and help to better leverage our knowledge and expertise across teams. Spanning physical boundaries is also important since our organizations are located in different locations/states. Telecommunication tools play an important part in eliminating the boundaries of distance. The Internet is used for web conference meetings to share documents and presentations, allowing everyone to collaborate as if we are in the same room. Teleconferences of the Executive Group and a larger Operations Group are conducted weekly, and frequent emails assure daily one-on-one communications. A secure Internet site facilitates efficient shared access to minutes of meetings, project planning documents, and operational updates.

Promoting a culture of innovation 

return to Article Outline

Transformational change requires the ability to openly challenge the way organizations do business. We are creating a shared vision of transformational change and a sustainable culture of innovation that consistently challenges accepted practices and asks our team members to work outside their comfort zones. The ACW project intends to transform nursing practice, education, and research in the service of improved patient outcomes by embedding EBNP at the point of care and documenting nursing practice systematically to enable a program of research. Innovations will be measured by our ability to: (1) identify, synthesize, and make actionable nursing evidence defined by nursing phenomena of care; (2) educate staff nurses and managers to enhance the uptake of new workflows; (3) rapidly embed new evidence-based decision support and documentation into the work flow of nurses at the point of care; (4) populate a data repository and analyze data to improve the quality of care and outcomes; (5) conduct research; and (6) disseminate new knowledge.

Recognition of the prevailing culture within each partner/organization has been critical in establishing a culture of innovation and engagement. Measuring the innovation capability before each implementation serves as a baseline to enable monitoring and control. This process highlights areas of strengths and concerns and guides the organizations in planning appropriately for innovations in the future.

Driving innovation also requires more imaginative use of resources, including the skills and abilities of the innovators. Faced with the challenge of growing the teams into a standard development methodology while refining the process, we added a step into the methodology to collect feedback with multiple shareholders acting as reactor panels.

Shared governance 

return to Article Outline

Many of the changes often seemed disruptive and challenging in the short term. It has been critical to establish a viable structure for shared governance consistent with standards within each of the organizations. This structure consists of:


A Cabinet, comprised of one executive from each partner organization, which is responsible for the vision, resource allocation, contractual arrangements, and policies and procedures of each of the partners.

A Project Leader, an academic research scientist, who monitors the intellectual/conceptual integrity of the entire project and serves as the key liaison to multiple stakeholders and the greater health, research, and information technology communities.

An Executive Group, comprised of one person from each partner, which is responsible for the scope, prioritization, timeline, operations, and oversight of the budget/resources. The group has authority and responsibility for meeting the objectives outlined by the Cabinet. Our work is to monitor resources, remove barriers, improve communications, and arbitrate disputes.

Collaborative Work Teams which represent all partners and operate as tightly integrated units guided by a commitment to the synergy of team science and implementation to best meet the goals of the project. With the guidance of a project manager from each partner organization, the teams holds web conferences weekly to enhance communication and decision-making. The ACW KBNI project has also implemented Six Sigma and Lean strategies5 to continue to manage the complexity of both the development process and clinical workflow to the bedside nursing staff.

In summary, our success in transforming healthcare practice and research through this unique tripartite partnership will require that we constantly challenge each other to rethink how new knowledge is generated. The old rules no longer apply and we must be creative in our approaches to knowledge development and capture, as well as the development and testing of HIT solutions in the real world if we are to achieve success. We believe we are on the right track. Nurse satisfaction scores were evaluated pre- and post- KBNI implementation with a 34% improvement in overall nurse satisfaction with the EHR with no change in their perceived time spent in documentation. The ACW partnership has adopted the philosophy of successful NFL coach Tony Dungy who declares in his book, UNcommon, “We are learning how to win another way.”6 With recent focus on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Academy members will benefit from the knowledge gained from partnerships between healthcare providers, HIT vendors, and academic institutions in planning strategic initiatives to transform practice and cut healthcare costs while improving patient outcomes.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In:  Van Bemmel JH,  McCray AT,  Alexa T editor. 2000 Yearbook of Medical Informatics-Patient-Centered Systems. Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, Germany: Schattauer; 2000;p. 65–70.

2. 2Schein EH. Organizational Culture and Leadership. (3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2004;.

3. 3Ela S, Lang N, Lundeen S. Time for a nursing legacy: Ensuring excellence through actionable knowledge. Nurse Leader. 2006;4:42S–55S.

4. 4Lang NM, Hook ML, Akre ME, Kim TY, Berg KS, Lundeen SP, et al. Partnerships to Accelerate Building Useful Clinical Decision Support Systems. In:  Weaver C,  Delaney C,  Webber P,  Carr R editor. Nursing and Informatics for the 21st Century: An International Look at the Trends, Cases, and the Future. Chicago, IL: Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS); 2006;p. 291–303.

5. 5Amheiter ED, Maleyeff J. The Integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine. 2005;17:5–18.

6. 6Dungy T, Whitaker N. UNcommon: Finding Your Own Path to Significance. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House; 2009;.

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Dr. Sally Lundeen, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, 2200 E. Kenwood Blvd. Milwaukee, WI 53201-0413

 Sally Lundeen, RN, PhD, FAAN, is Dean and Professor, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

 Ellen Harper, RN, MBA, is Healthcare Executive Director, Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, MO

 Karleen Kerfoot, PhD, RN, CNAA, FAAN, is Vice President and Chief Clinical Officer, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI

PII: S0029-6554(09)00049-9

doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2009.03.005


View previous. 13 of 13