« Previous
Next »
Nursing Outlook
Volume 58, Issue 1
, Pages 52-58
, January 2010
A situation-specific theory of Midlife Women's Attitudes Toward Physical Activity (MAPA)
References
- . Midlife women's adherence to home-based walking during maintenance. Nurs Res. 2005;54:33–40
- . Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996;
- . Physical activity: perspectives of Mexican American and Anglo American midlife women. Health Care Women Int. 2002;23:894–904
- . Environmental, policy, and cultural factors related to physical activity in a diverse sample of women: The Women's Cardiovascular Health Network Project—introduction and methodology. Women's Health. 2002;36:1–15
- . Correlations of work, leisure, and sports physical activities and health status with socioeconomic factors: a national study in Israel. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:262–265
- . Determinants of physical activity among Taiwanese adolescents: an application of the health promotion model. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25:25–36
- . Self-determination theory and physical activity among breast cancer survivors. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008;30:23–38
- . Testing the efficacy of the theory of planned behavior to explain strength training in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2007;15:1–12
- . Predicting physical activity among low-income Mexican American women: application of the theory of planned behavior. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31:115–122
- . Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions. Health Educ Res. 1988;3:273–282
- . Development of situation-specific theories: an integrative approach. Adv Nurs Sci. 2005;28:137–151
- . The participation of physical activity and its associated factors in the elderly. Kaohsing J Med Sci (Chinese version). 1996;12:348–358
- . General social support and physical activity: an analysis of the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 2001;92:210–213
- . Physical activity of Korean immigrant women in the U.S.: needs and attitudes. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001;38:567–577
- . Midlife women's attitudes toward physical activity. JOGNN. 2008;37:203–213
- The effect of a walking program on perceived benefits and barriers to exercise in postmenopausal African American women. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;29:43–49
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Prevalence Data. Texas-2003. Physical activity. Available at: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/display.asp?cat=PA&yr=2003&qkey=4418&state=TX. Accessed April 14, 2006.
- . Socioeconomic status of women with diabetes—United States, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;51:147–148159
- . Relation of demographic and lifestyle factors to symptoms in a multiracial/ethnic population of women 40-55 years of age. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;152:463–473
- . Age, gender, and urban-rural differences in the correlates of physical activity. Prev Med. 2004;39:1115–1125
- . Work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: effects of disease, social and work factors. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:551–556
- . The association of menopause and physical functioning in women at midlife. JAGS. 2001;49:1485–1492
- . Association of physical activity and body mass index with novel and traditional cardiovascular biomarkers in women. JAMA. 2006;295:1412–1419
- . Differences in leisure-time physical activity levels between blacks and whites in population-based samples: The Minnesota Heart Survey. J Behav Med. 1991;14:1–9
- . Relations among age, exercise, and psychological variables in a community sample of women. Health Psychol. 1996;15:110–113
- . Female involvement in physical recreation—gender roles as a constraint. J Phys Educ Recreation Dance. 1990;61:52–56
- . Technologies of the Gendered Body. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1996;
Theory development was conducted as a part of a study supported by Grant No. R01NR010568 from the National Institute of Nursing Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Nursing Research or the National Institutes of Health.
PII: S0029-6554(09)00119-5
doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.07.001
© 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Nursing Outlook
Volume 58, Issue 1
, Pages 52-58
, January 2010
