Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 53, ISSUE 2, P73-78, March 2005

Download started.

Ok

Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials: Strategies for managing confounds

      Background

      Randomized trials have been criticized for being more protocol than participant-centered, with concerns raised about higher subject attrition and limited generalizability under controlled conditions. Informal caregivers are similar to other participants in community-based trials: many are unlikely to remain in a trial without procedural adaptations to meet some of their needs.

      Purpose

      This article discusses design and statistical strategies for tracking potential confounds associated with 3 participant-centered adaptations that may be made in community-based caregiver trials: tailoring multi-component interventions, using interpersonal contacts for participant maintenance, and non-blinding of trial participants. The intent of the article is to initiate dialogue on the seldom-discussed issue of participant-centered adaptations in community-based trials.

      Conclusions

      Participant-centered adaptations may reduce subject attrition and enhance generalizability, but protocol adaptation can compromise trial integrity. The challenge for investigators is to develop scientifically sound methods for tracking / controlling potential confounds associated with each adaptation.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Nursing Outlook
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Health and Human Services
        Informal caregiving. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC1998
        • Gwyther L.
        Social issues of the Alzheimer’s and family patient.
        Am J Med. 1998; 104: 17S-21S
        • Schulz R.
        • Beach S.R.
        Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality.
        JAMA. 1999; 282: 2215-2219
        • Vedhara K.
        • Shanks N.
        • Anderson S.
        • Lightman S.
        The role of stressors and psychosocial variables in the stress process.
        Psychosomatic Med. 2000; 62: 374-385
        • Brodaty H.
        • Green A.
        • Koschera A.
        Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia.
        JAGS. 2003; 51: 108-115
        • Knight B.G.
        • Lutzky S.M.
        • Macofsky-Urban F.
        A meta-analytic review of interventions for caregiver distress.
        Gerontologist. 1993; 33: 240-248
        • Sorensen S.
        • Pinquart M.
        • Duberstein P.
        How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis.
        Gerontologist. 2002; 42: 356-372
        • Benson K.
        • Hartz A.
        A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1878-1886
        • Concato J.
        • Shah N.
        • Horwitz R.I.
        Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 1887-1892
        • Fogg L.
        • Gross D.
        Threats to validity in randomized clinical trials.
        Research Nurs Hlth. 2000; 23: 79-87
        • Gross D.
        • Fogg L.
        Clinical trials in the 21st century.
        Research Nurs Hlth. 2001; 24: 530-539
        • Lazarus R.
        • Folkman S.S.
        Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer, New York, NY1984
        • Gignac M.A.
        • Gottlieb B.H.
        Caregivers’ appraisals of efficacy in coping with dementia.
        Psychol Aging. 1996; 11: 214-225
        • Schulz R.
        • Gallagher-Thompson D.
        • Haley W.
        • Czaja S.
        Understanding the interventions process.
        in: Schulz R. Handbook on dementia caregiving evidence-based interventions for family caregivers. Springer Publications, New York, NY2001: 33-60
        • Bourgeois M.
        • Schulz R.
        • Burgio L.
        Interventions for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        Internatl J Aging Human Development. 1996; 43: 35-92
        • Fletcher R.
        • Fletcher S.
        • Wagner E.
        Clinical epidemiology. (3rd edition). Kluwer, New York, NY1996
        • Friedman L.
        • Furberg C.
        • DeMets D.
        Fundamentals of clinical trials. 3rd edition. Springer Pubs, New York, NY1998
        • Spilker B.
        Guide to clinical trials. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA1991
        • Mittelman M.
        • Ferris S.
        • Steinberg M.
        • Shulman E.
        • Mackell J.
        • Ambinder A.
        • et al.
        An intervention that delays institutionalization of Alzheimer’s disease patients.
        Gerontologist. 1993; 33: 730-740
        • Mittelman M.S.
        • Ferris S.H.
        • Shulman E.
        • Steinberg G.
        • Ambinder A.
        • Mackell J.A.
        • et al.
        A comprehensive support program.
        Gerontologist. 1995; 35: 792-802
        • Mittelman M.
        • Roth D.
        • Haley W.
        • Zarit S.
        Effects of a caregiver intervention on negative caregiver appraisals of behavior problems in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
        J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004; 59B: P27-P34
        • Gerdner L.A.
        • Buckwalter K.C.
        • Reed D.
        Impact of a psychoeducational intervention on caregiver response to behavioral problems.
        Nurs Research. 2002; 51: 363-374
        • Keppel G.
        Design and analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1991
        • Bryk A.S.
        • Raudenbush S.W.
        Hierarchical linear models. International Universities Press, Newbury Park, NJ1992
        • Rothman K.
        • Michaels K.
        The continuing unethical use of placebo controls.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 394-398
        • Zarit S.
        Interventions with frail elders and their families.
        in: Stephens M. Crowther J. Hobfoll S. Tennenbaum D. Stress and coping in later life families. Hemisphere, Washington, DC1990: 241-262
        • Chang B.
        Cognitive-behavioral interventions for home-bound caregivers of persons with dementia.
        Nurs Research. 1999; 48: 173-182
        • Grant J.S.
        • Elliott T.R.
        • Weaver M.
        • Bartolucci A.A.
        • Giger J.N.
        Telephone intervention with family caregivers of stroke survivors after rehabilitation.
        Stroke. 2002; 33: 2060-2065
        • Carroll K.
        Enhancing retention in clinical trials of psychosocial treatments.
        NDIA Research Monograph. 1997; : 4-24
        • Given B.
        • Keilman L.
        • Collins C.
        • Given C.
        Strategies to minimize attrition in longitudinal studies.
        Nurs Research. 1990; 39: 184-186
        • Hunt J.
        • White E.
        Retaining and tracking cohort study members.
        Epidemiologic Reviews. 1998; 20: 57-70
        • Lichstein K.L.
        • Riedel B.W.
        • Grieve R.
        Fair tests of clinical trials.
        Adv Behav Research Therapy. 1994; 16: 1-29
        • Murray D.
        Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford University Press, New York, NY1998
        • Neter J.
        • Kutner M.
        • Nachtsheim C.
        • Wasserman W.
        Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA1996
        • McCulloch C.
        • Searle S.
        Generalized, linear, and mixed models. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY2001
      1. University of Alabama at Birmingham. Project ASSIST for Chronic Illness Caregiver (5 RO1 NR008285). Year 2 ROGRESS REPORT SUMMARY: Submitted May, 2004 to National Institute of Nursing Research. Principal Investigator: Linda Lindsey Davis.

      Biography

      Linda Lindsey Davis is at the School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC.

      Biography

      Michael Weaver is a Professor, School of Nursing and Department of Biostatistics, at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

      Biography

      Barbara Habermann is an Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, and a Scientist, Center for Aging, at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

      Biography

      Kathleen Buckwalter is a Professor, College of Nursing, and Associate Provost for Health Sciences at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.