WIC (The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children): Policy versus practice regarding breastfeeding


      The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) provides foods, education, and referrals to participants who are considered to be at nutritional risk. The outreach of the program is impressive, and nearly 9.17 million people participated in the program in 2010. WIC participation is associated with many positive outcomes, including improved birthweights and childhood dietary practices. Despite these benefits, WIC mothers experience lower breastfeeding rates when compared with demographically similar women who do not participate in the WIC program. According to WIC, “A breastfeeding mother and her infant shall be placed in the highest priority level.” Despite this statement and others that support breastfeeding, WIC allocates only 0.6% of its budget toward breastfeeding initiatives. Formula expenses accounted for 11.6% ($850 million) of WIC's 2009 expenses. The inconsistency between WIC's policies that encourage breastfeeding vs. practices that favor formula begs further examination. Research shows consistent success with peer counseling programs among WIC participants; however, little money is budgeted for these programs. Rebates included, WIC spends 25 times more on formula than on breastfeeding initiatives. The American Academy of Nursing Expert Panel on Breastfeeding is calling for a re-evaluation of how these taxpayer dollars are spent. Additionally, the American Academy of Nursing recommends a shift from formula bargaining to an investment in structured peer counseling programs. All WIC programs should offer peer counseling support services that encourage breastfeeding and meet the needs of the families they serve.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Nursing Outlook
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Best Start Social Marketing (2004). Using Loving Support© to Implement best practices in peer counseling: Final research brief (FNS contract 58-3198-1-050).

        • Bronner Y.
        • Barber T.
        • Vogelhut J.
        • Resnik A.
        Breastfeeding peer counseling: Results from the national WIC survey.
        Journal of Human Lactation. 2001; 17: 119-125
        • Calfield L.
        • Gross S.
        • Bentley M.
        • Bronner Y.
        • Kessler L.
        • Jensen J.
        • Paige D.
        • et al.
        WIC-based interventions to promote breastfeeding among African-American Women in Baltimore: Effects of breastfeeding initiation and continuation.
        Journal of Human Lactation. 1998; 14: 15-22
        • Evans K.
        • Labbok M.
        • Abrahams S.W.
        WIC and breastfeeding support services: Does the mix of services offered vary with race and ethnicity?.
        Breastfeeding Medicine. 2011; 6: 401-406
        • Ferguson S.L.
        An activist looks at nursing's role in health policy development.
        Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 2001; 30: 546-551
        • Gross S.
        • Resnik A.
        • Cross-Barnet C.
        • Nanda J.
        • Augustyn M.
        • Paige D.
        The differential impact of WIC peer counseling programs on breastfeeding initiation across the state of Maryland.
        Journal of Human Lactation. 2009; 25: 435-443
        • Kistin N.
        • Abramson R.
        • Dublin P.
        Effect of peer counselors on breastfeeding initiation, exclusivity, and duration among low-income urban women.
        Journal of Human Lactation. 1994; 10: 11-15
        • Lawrence R.
        Lower breastfeeding rates among supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children participants: A call for action.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 1432-1433
        • Li R.
        • Darling N.
        • Maurice E.
        • Barker L.
        • Grummer-Strawn L.
        Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: The 2002 National Immunization Survey.
        Pediatrics. 2005; 115: 31-37
      2. Marcus, R. (2010). Lobbying fight over infant formula highlights budget gridlock. The Washington Post. Retrieved from

      3. National WIC Association Position Paper. Retrieved from

      4. National WIC Association National Breastfeeding Strategic Plan, Retrieved rom

      5. Neuberger, Z. (2010). WIC food package should be based on science: Foods with new functional ingredients should be provided only if they deliver health or nutritional benefits. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Washington, DC.

        • Pugh L.C.
        • Serwint J.R.
        • Frick K.D.
        • Nanda J.P.
        • Sharps P.W.
        • Spatz D.L.
        • Milligan R.A.
        A randomized controlled community-based trial to improve breastfeeding rates among urban low-income mothers.
        Academic Pediatrics. 2010; 10: 14-20
        • Ryan A.
        • Rush D.
        • Krieger F.
        • Lewandowski G.
        Recent declines in breastfeeding in the United States.
        Pediatrics. 1991; 88: 719-727
        • Ryan A.
        • Zhou W.
        Lower breastfeeding rates persist among the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children participants, 1978-2003.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 1136-1146
        • Stewart-Glenn J.
        Knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of managers, coworkers, and employed breastfeeding mothers.
        American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal. 2008; 56: 423-429
      6. United States Breastfeeding Committee (2008). Protect, Promote, and Support Breastfeeding Through Legislation. Retrieved from

      7. USDA (2012a). Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from

      8. USDA (2012b). Nutrition Program Facts Food and Nutrition Services. Retrieved from

      9. USDA (2012c). Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from

        • Volpe E.
        • Bear M.
        Enhancing breastfeeding initiation in adolescent mothers through the Breastfeeding Educated and Supported Teen (BEST) club.
        Journal of Human Lactation. 2000; 16: 196-200
        • Walker S.A.
        • Avis M.
        Common reasons why peer education fails.
        Journal of Adolescence. 1999; 22: 573-577
        • Wambach K.
        • Aaronson L.
        • Breedlove G.
        • Domian E.W.
        • Rojjanasrirat W.
        • Yeh H.W.
        A randomized controlled trial of breastfeeding support and education for adolescent mothers.
        Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2010; 33: 486-505
      10. Weimer, J. (2001). The economic benefits of breastfeeding: A review and analysis (Food AssistanceNutr Res Rep No. [FANRR13]:20). USDA.

      11. Yun, S., Qian, L., Mertzlufft, K., Kruse, C., White, M., Fuller, P. & Zhu, B. (2009)Evaluation of the Missouri WIC (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children) breast-feeding peer counseling programme. Public Health Nutrition, 13(2), 229-237.