The American Association of Colleges of Nursing recommends that nursing schools transition their advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) programs to doctor of nursing practice (DNP) programs by 2015. However, most schools have not yet made this full transition. The purpose of this study was to understand schools' decisions regarding the full transition to the DNP.
Key informant interviews and an online survey of nursing school deans and program directors were performed.
The vast majority of schools value the DNP in preparing APRNs for the future of the health care system. However, other important factors influence many schools to fully transition or not to the postbaccalaureate DNP, including perceived student and employer demand, issues concerning accreditation and certification, and resource constraints.
Multiple pathways to becoming an APRN are likely to remain until various factors (e.g., student and employer demand, certification and accreditation issues, and resource constraints) yield a more favorable environment for a full transition to the DNP.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Nursing Outlook
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree.Author, Chicago, IL2007
- (AACN) The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice.2006 (Retrieved from)
- AACN position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing.2004 (Retrieved from)
- Physical therapist (PT) education overview.2013 (Retrieved from)
- The DNP by 2015: A study of the institutional, political, and professional issues that facilitate or impede establishing a post-baccalaureate doctor of nursing practice program.RAND Corperation, Santa Monica, CA2015
- The doctor of nursing practice: A national workforce perspective.Nursing Outlook. 2011; 59: 9-17https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2010.11.003
- Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.Qualitative Health Research. 2005; 15: 1277-1288https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
- The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health.National Academies Press, Washington, DC2011
- The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health.National Academies Press, Washington, DC2010
- The role of nurse practitioners in reinventing primary care.Health Affairs. 2010; 29: 893-899
- Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008: A systematic review.Nursing Economics. 2011; 29: 1-21
- Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010-2025.Annals of Family Medicine. 2012; 10: 503-509
- Doctor of nursing practice programs across the United States: A benchmark of information: Part I: Program characteristics.Journal of Professional Nursing. 2012; 28: 265-273
Published online: January 16, 2015
Accepted: January 10, 2015
Received in revised form: December 23, 2014
Received: October 13, 2014
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirectAccess this article on ScienceDirect
- Is it time to re-examine the pipeline for advanced practice nursing practice?Nursing OutlookVol. 63Issue 4
- PreviewWe read with great interest and concern Dr. Broome's editorial “Collective Genius” (Broome, 2015) and the article by Martsolf, Auerbach, Spetz, Pearson, and Muchow (2015) in the same issue. As Dr. Broome so elegantly stated, we firmly believe that nursing is well positioned to address the multiple internal and external forces, such as clinical preceptor availability and optimal teaching/learning strategies for graduate clinical education, to ensure adequate production of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the future.