Advertisement

Demystifying the National Institutes of Health diversity supplement: Mentee and mentor experiences and recommendations

Published:November 14, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2022.07.007

      Highlights

      • The diversity supplement is similar to a career development award and should be approached as such with regard to strong mentorship and well-thought-out training
      • Diversity supplements are an important start to the careers of underrepresented researchers; thus, mentees should consider developing the application around their research interests and goals
      • There is a need for a multipronged approach (institutions, NIH, mentors, and mentees) to enhance awareness of diversity supplements

      Abstract

      Background

      The National Institutes of Health supports professional development of diverse researchers through diversity supplements. Limited awareness and understanding of the application process have hindered utilization of this funding mechanism.

      Purpose

      We describe perspectives and recommendations of mentee and mentor recipients of diversity supplements.

      Methods

      Our working group, comprised of faculty from an Historically Black College and University and an R1 research university, conducted stakeholder interviews with three mentees and four mentors from various institutions. We used content analysis to derive categories of experiences and recommendations.

      Discussion

      Interviewees reported on advantages of diversity supplements, ensuring institutional support, identifying a good mentee-mentor match, developing grantsmanship specific to diversity supplements, and increasing numbers of these applications.

      Conclusion

      We identify opportunities for stakeholders to increase awareness of diversity supplements. Our data support greater understanding of this mechanism, establishing strong mentoring relationships, and submitting robust applications. Findings can enhance diversity among the scientific community.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      NIHMD (National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Nursing Outlook
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Birt L.
        • Scott S.
        • Cavers D.
        • Campbell C.
        • Walter F.
        Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?.
        Qualitative Health Research. 2016; 26 (NovEpub 2016 Jul 10. PMID: 27340178): 1802-1811https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
        • Busby K.R.
        • Draucker C.B.
        • Reising D.L.
        Exploring mentoring and nurse faculty: An integrative review.
        Journal of Professional Nursing. 2022; 38 (Jan-FebEpub 2021 Nov 24. PMID: 35042587): 26-39https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.006
      1. David, D., Weir, M., Enwerem, N., Schulman-Green, D., Okunji, P. O., Travers, J. L., & Clark-Cutaia, M. (2022). Enhancing the Use of Diversity Supplements: Perspectives of NIH Program Diversity Officers and University Research Administrators. Nursing Outlook (Under Review).

        • Elo S.
        • Kyngäs H.
        The qualitative content analysis process.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 62: 107-115https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2648.2007.04569.X
        • Ginther D.K.
        • Schaffer W.T.
        • Schnell J.
        • Masimore B.
        • Liu F.
        • Haak L.L.
        • Kington R.
        Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.
        Science (New York, N.Y.). 2011; 333: 1015https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1196783
        • National Institutes of Health
        Initiatives for underrepresented minorities in biomedical research.
        National Institutes of Health. 1989; 18: 1-12
        • Hill K.A.
        • Desai M.M.
        • Chaudhry S.I.
        • Nguyen M.
        • Boatright D.
        NIH diversity supplement awards by year and administering institute.
        JAMA. 2021; 326: 2427-2429https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2021.19360
        • Hoppe T.A.
        • Litovitz A.
        • Willis K.A.
        • Meseroll R.A.
        • Perkins M.J.
        • Hutchins B.I.
        • Davis A.F.
        • Lauer M.S.
        • Valantine H.A.
        • Anderson J.M.
        • Santangelo G.M.
        Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists.
        Science Advances. 2019; : 5https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIADV.AAW7238
      2. National Institutes of Health. (2012). Draft Report of the Advisory Committee to the Director Working Group on Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce. https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/DiversityBiomedicalResearchWorkforceReport.pdf

      3. National Institutes of Health. (2021). Research supplements to promote diversity in health-related research (Admin Supp - Clinical Trial Not Allowed). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/pa-20-222.html

      4. Preis, S. R. S. S., Tepperberg, S., Torres, A., & Walkey, A. (2020). NIH Diversity Supplements and Research Faculty Diversity at Boston University. https://www.bumc.bu.edu/facdev-medicine/files/2020/05/MFL-Diversity-Supplement-Executive-Summary.pdf

      5. Racial Disparities in NIH Funding | SWD at NIH. (n.d.). Retrieved February 17, (2022)., from https://diversity.nih.gov/building-evidence/racial-disparities-nih-funding

        • Ray K.N.
        • Miller E.
        Strengthening stakeholder-engaged research and research on stakeholder engagement.
        Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. 2017; 6: 375-389
        • Varvasovszky Z.
        • Brugha R.
        A stakeholder analysis.
        Health Policy and Planning. 2000; 15: 338-345https://doi.org/10.1093/HEAPOL/15.3.338